95
„Es IST IMMER DIESELBE MELANGE“
SUMMARY
“It is always the same mixture”
The Antique Dealer Salomon Weininger and Vienna Counterfeiting
in the Age of Historicism
Since the often-quoted 1974 essay by J. F. Hayward, Salomon Weininger,
who was born in Hradisch (Hradiste, modern Slovakia) in 1822 and
worked in Vienna, has been suspected as the man behind almost every
Vienna forgery produced in the 19 th Century. In fact, Weininger was
responsible for a whole series of counterfeits, and in two spectacular and
sensational trials he was finally convicted and imprisoned for theft and
fraud. He died of dropsy on 21 November 1879 in the prison at Stein
in Lower Austria. However, Weininger was not the “master faker” he was
accused of being, but rather a resourceful and well-cormected antique
dealer who knew how to profit from conditions in the era of Historicism.
Among the wealth of craftsmen who had been schooled in historical
models and techniques, he found a number of artists who were willing to
put their skills to work for him. Ideal prerequisites were provided by the
generally eclectic interests of the time and widespread copying of historical
styles. Making copies was part of the everyday work of artisans at the
time.
Today we know that most of the fakes initiated by Weininger remained
undetected during his lifetime. Düring his interrogation and trials beginning
in 1876 he admitted only that which could be proved anyway or
might shorten his sentence. Thus the two trials dealt only with the activities
connected with the museum of Viennas Palais Modena. From these
holdings, the so-called Estense Collection, he borrowed objects, had them
copied, and then replaced the Originals with the copies. He chose a similar
modus operandi for another collection that today is found in the Kunsthistorisches
Museum: the Ecclesiastical Treasury. Today we know that
within the extensive holdings of the Ecclesiastical Treasury are at least
fourteen counterfeit items or objects assembled from copied and original
parts and that are connected with Salomon Weininger. In the second part
of the present essay, they are treated in detail. The first part, however,
focuses on the person Salomon Weininger, his methods and modus operandi
as well as the artists and craftsmen who worked for him. Detailed
discussion of the case files and court reports, which have not previously
been the subject of research, provides the necessary insight into Weininger’s
activity and at the same into the customs and morals of art production
in Vienna and of collecting in the second half of the 19 th Century.