Full text : Jahrbuch der Kunsthistorischen Sammlungen in Wien, Band 53/54 (N.F.) (LIII/LIV=89/90)

The  Bronzes  of  Pier  Jacopo  Alari-Bonacolsi,  called  Antico

49

that  would  make  it  an  suitable  counterpart  to  the  Spinario.  That  the  motif  of  Hercules  and  Antaeus  was  created
criginally  for  the  Bishop  is  attested  in  a  letter  from  Antico  to  Isabella  of  April  1519  listing  possible  replications
of  statuettes  formerly  made  for  the  Bishop,  and  the  group  in  Vienna  (cat.  18,  B)  bears  Isabella’s  inscription.
The  first  documents  concerning  Antico’s  statuettes  for  the  Bishop  are  letters  of  1498.  These  concerned  the  illicit
use  of  Antico’s  raodels,  or,  more  likely,  molds,  of  an  Apollo  and  of  the  Nude  of  the  Tortoise  -  a  tortoise,  it  is
learned  later,  upon  which  she  was  kneeling.  In  1501  an  Apollo  is  again  mentioned,  now  a  replica  which  the  Bishop
planned  to  send  to  Venice.  It  may  be  presumed  that  the  two  motifs  were  creations  based  upon  the  Roman
sculptures  of  the  “Apollo”,  which  was  later  famous  as  the  “Apollo  Belvedere” 87 ,  and  the  unique  Madrid  “Venus
Kneeling  upon  a  Tortoise”.  A  discussion  of  Antico’s  bronzetti  of  women  in  the  early  years  of  his  midperiod  will
follow  that  of  the  males  below.  Three  autograph  statuettes  of  Apollo  survive.  Two  of  these,  those  in  Frankfort  and
Venice  (cat.  13,  A;  13,  B),  appear  to  follow  closely  upon  one  another  and  the  details  of  their  hair,  while  fresh,  are
not  so  exquisitely  rendered  as  those  of  other  autograph  statuettes  of  both  the  mid-  and  late  periods.  Both  are
parcel-gilt  and  their  eyes  are  inlaid  with  silver.  The  earliest  “Apollo”  is  represented  by  the  specimen  in  Frankfurt.
Inhibited  by  the  Quattrocento  emphasis  upon  the  four-sided  statue,  Antico  was  obviously  uncomfortable  with
the  mild  figura  serpentinata  and  gliding  stance  of  the  “Apollo  Belvedere”  and  here  stiffened  his  figure  to  form  a
Polykleitan  posture  by  placing  the  lef  t  leg  further  to  that  side  and  lowering  the  heel  toward  the  right.  He  completed
the  right  arm,  which  in  the  prototype  lacked  only  fingers  and  thumb,  and  the  left  arm  from  slightly  beyond  the
drapery  in  a  manner  permitting  the  hand  to  hold  a  bow 88 .  He  was,  apparently,  the  first  to  restore  the  left  arm  to
this  purpose 89 .  The  profile  of  the  face  with  its  full  chin  and  small  features  is  analogous  to  the  portrait  of
Gianfrancesco  on  the  Fortuna  medal  and  those  of  the  Venus  Felix  and  the  Cupid.  The  lips  are  slightly  separated
as  in  the  antique  marble,  and  corkscrew  curls  were  added  to  the  hair  to  give  it  greater  symmetry.  The  drapery  has
been  slightly  shortened  and  regularized  and  has  a  more  mellifluous  outline.  This  bronze  is,  presumably,  the  model
of  1498.  Not  satisfied  with  this  Version,  and  possibly  with  the  shorter  stature  of  the  Gonzaga  in  mind,  it  was
probably  not  much  later  that  he  imposed  a  more  personal  style  upon  the  “Apollo”.  The  result  was  the  Ca  d’Oro
“Apollo”.  This  Statuette  is  now  a  confident  High  Renaissance  figure  in  Antico’s  mature  style  and  stylistically  a
key  to  other  earlier  statuettes  for  the  Bishop.  Compared  to  the  Frankfort  “Apollo”  the  stride  is  freer  and  more
similar  to  that  of  the  antique  figure,  but,  proportionately,  the  legs  are  shorter,  the  neck  and  torso  heavier  -  as  well
as  more  sensuously  modelled  -  and  the  head  larger.  The  face  is  now  expressive,  and  the  hairstyle  more  compact,
the  incongruous  corkscrew  curls  of  the  Frankfort  model  eliminated.  As  the  right  wrist  is  flawed,  the  position  of
the  right  hand  differs  from  that  of  the  Frankfort  “Apollo”.  Very  likely  it  was  a  replica  of  this  Statuette  that  was
sent  to  Venice  in  1501  as  its  model  can  be  presumed  to  have  originated  at  an  earlier  date.  Its  first  casting  may  be
the  Ca  d’Oro  “Apollo”,  which  by  tradition  was  connected  to  the  main  Gonzaga  house.
The  Hercules  (cat.  19)  and  the  “Meleager”  (cat.  21)  have  proportions  similar  to  the  Venetian  “Apollo”.
Stylistically  these  two  motifs  can  be  presumed  to  originate  in  its  orbit,  that  is,  in  the  period  c.  1500.  The  Frick
“Hercules”  (cat.  19,  A)  and  the  “Meleager”,  together  with  the  Jantzen  “Young  Hercules”  (cat.  17,  A),  have  large
areas  of  gilding  and  silvered  eyes.  Along  with  the  Apollos,  these  statuettes  and  the  Rothschild  “Nymph”  (cat.  23,
A)  are  among  the  most  sumptuous  bronzes  produced  by  Antico.  The  Frick  “Hercules”  (cat.  19,  A)  may  be  the
bronze  commissioned  by  the  Bishop  in  1499.  It  is  a  restless  motif  for  which  the  prototype  is  likely  to  have  been
the  bronze  Statuette  of  “Hercules”  in  the  Musee  du  Louvre  (cat.  19,  D).  The  “Meleager”  (cf.  cat.  21)  has  been
87 )  The  provenance  of  the  “Apollo  Belvedere”  is  uncertain  (cf.  Brummer,  op.  cit.,  cf.  n.  83,  pp.  44  f).  The  statue  once  belonged  to  Pope
Julius  II  when  a  Cardinal  and  was  placed  by  him  in  the  Vatican  Belvedere  Court.  The  “Codex  Escurialensis”  documents  its  location  in  the  garden
of  his  Roman  church,  S.  Pietro  in  Vincoli,  where  it  was  possibly  available  as  early  as  c.  1490  (H.  Egger,  Codex  Escurialensis,  Vienna,  1906,
fol.  53,  54;  fol.  53  bears  the  inscription  nelorto  disapiero  invinhola).  Antico  no  doubt  saw  it  on  his  Roman  trip  in  1497,  if  not  earlier.  It  was
hot  restored  in  Antico’s  lifetime.  Although  the  right  arm  is  now  truncated  near  the  elbow,  before  the  restoration  of  the  statue  by  Montorsoli
in  1532  or  1533  the  original  lower  arm  was  in  a  similar  position  to  that  of  Antico’s  two  bronzes,  the  hand  lacking  the  fingers  and  thumb  (cf.
M.  Winner,  Zum  Apoll  von  Belvedere,  in:  Jahrbuch  der  Berliner  Museen,  X,  1968,  pp.  181  f).  At  that  time  the  left  arm  ended  slightly  beyond
the  drapery  hanging  from  it.
88 )  The  object  in  the  left  hand  may  not  be  Contemporary  with  the  Statuette.
89 )  In  the  early  Cinquecento  the  bow  was  thought  by  some  to  belong  to  the  right  hand.  The  “Antiquarie  Prospetiche  Romane”,  dated  c.  1500
(cf.  D.  Fienga,  Antiquarie  Prospetiche  Romane  composte  per  Prospective  Milanese  Depictore,  diss.  University  of  California,  1970),
mentioned  that  the  Apollo  had  a  bow  at  his  side:  Ha  el  cappelgenouesum  certappollo  che  ha  gettato  el  carcasso  alle  spalle  collarcho  lento  spinto
fiacho  e  mollo.  Which  side  of  the  figure  was  unspecified,  but,  as  the  left  hand  was  lacking  until  Montorsoli’s  restoration,  it  can  be  presumed
that  the  bow  was  in  the  right  hand.  Variants  in  the  first  years  of  the  sixteenth  Century  placing  the  bow  in  the  lower  hand  are:  Dürer  (Poynter
Apollo,  The  Metropolitan  Museum  of  Art;  Apollo,  Bibliothek  des  Kunsthauses,  Zürich)  and  Filippino  Lippi  (?),  Musee  du  Louvre,  Cabinet
des  Dessins,  No.  9877).
            
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.